Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 07:59:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C1EBF0DFBF0F41B135E460ACE5B6E1BBB55CB5CA2B529BC393889CAEB6369DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The suggested note above provides an opinion on government spending, but there was no inaccuracy in the tweet that needed to be corrected. Debate about allocating funds can be had in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655881842753413121
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C1EBF0DFBF0F41B135E460ACE5B6E1BBB55CB5CA2B529BC393889CAEB6369DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1683705585675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16558818427534131212C1EBF0DFBF0F41B135E460ACE5B6E1BBB55CB5CA2B529BC393889CAEB6369DF