Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 15:53:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 174D91E43C2D92A383219529B6EDCD63F8485EADA04F82E2CC88DA3675F05B65
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The suggested note above provides an opinion on government spending, but there was no inaccuracy in the tweet that needed to be corrected. Debate about allocating funds can be had in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655881842753413121
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 174D91E43C2D92A383219529B6EDCD63F8485EADA04F82E2CC88DA3675F05B65
  • createdAtMillis - 1683647627147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655881842753413121174D91E43C2D92A383219529B6EDCD63F8485EADA04F82E2CC88DA3675F05B65