Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 05:31:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Bellingcat have a really good reputation as fact-checkers in the open source intelligence community. The author is likely to be dismissing their findings not of naiveté but likely from political motivation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655796111070601217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5
  • createdAtMillis - 1683610293943
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655796111070601217F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5