Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 06:50:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 610BF799EF168950DB22B53AA1F4A56AB7E494C62C8A2FEA65F4820164B185D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Bellingcat have a really good reputation as fact-checkers in the open source intelligence community. The author is likely to be dismissing their findings not of naiveté but likely from political motivation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655796111070601217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 610BF799EF168950DB22B53AA1F4A56AB7E494C62C8A2FEA65F4820164B185D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1683615002128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655796111070601217610BF799EF168950DB22B53AA1F4A56AB7E494C62C8A2FEA65F4820164B185D1