Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 16:44:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E947087961C320152AB1FABCAE05CFE5E2EE3E6607BE3D35FF7B2D94481891C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually correct. Note suggesting that it is misleading is missing the point. If you wish to debate the risk VS your personal risk tolerance do so in the replys. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655786348073172992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E947087961C320152AB1FABCAE05CFE5E2EE3E6607BE3D35FF7B2D94481891C
  • createdAtMillis - 1683650674493
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16557863480731729924E947087961C320152AB1FABCAE05CFE5E2EE3E6607BE3D35FF7B2D94481891C