Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 17:25:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34DDF3B89DC38F9287FEC0C7DC5E533FA30AE7D54156DC5C2D96E6C75F425204
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually correct. Note suggesting that it is misleading is missing the point. If you wish to debate the risk VS your personal risk tolerance do so in the replys. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655786348073172992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34DDF3B89DC38F9287FEC0C7DC5E533FA30AE7D54156DC5C2D96E6C75F425204
  • createdAtMillis - 1683653101664
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165578634807317299234DDF3B89DC38F9287FEC0C7DC5E533FA30AE7D54156DC5C2D96E6C75F425204