Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 02:53:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B46B9BF8D9BE8E7FDC2170AF89D6EDE426E78E20CB4BA8F58E56562E4A696C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is factually correct. Note suggesting that it is misleading is missing the point. If you wish to debate the risk VS your personal risk tolerance do so in the replys. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655786348073172992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B46B9BF8D9BE8E7FDC2170AF89D6EDE426E78E20CB4BA8F58E56562E4A696C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683687208320
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16557863480731729922B46B9BF8D9BE8E7FDC2170AF89D6EDE426E78E20CB4BA8F58E56562E4A696C0