Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 06:19:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE65151EE1AFB9FEB36FA50F86162EB24CE5844A7826EDBECC166CD8F2EC28D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Above note is not needed- the above note author makes claims about the reliability of the sources the original tweet shows, but doesn't have any evidence to show they are false or misleading. Debates like this should go in the comment section. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655757179662548992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE65151EE1AFB9FEB36FA50F86162EB24CE5844A7826EDBECC166CD8F2EC28D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1683613150313
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655757179662548992CE65151EE1AFB9FEB36FA50F86162EB24CE5844A7826EDBECC166CD8F2EC28D9