Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 04:02:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB72611343514AF733D7158BD503CA1FEE5CB1F7DA0B7E50F048162F4908FE53
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet shares it's source. If the source is thought to be unreliable by some, that is for the comments section. We(community notes) should not be telling people which sources are to be trusted. That is what researching, even google is for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655741812391256065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB72611343514AF733D7158BD503CA1FEE5CB1F7DA0B7E50F048162F4908FE53
  • createdAtMillis - 1683604925693
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655741812391256065EB72611343514AF733D7158BD503CA1FEE5CB1F7DA0B7E50F048162F4908FE53