Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 09:49:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 785DCF8BB1A252972474BCEC5C1875CEE748D1CE7CBAB0CCFE4DDF10A2E089CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet shares it's source. If the source is thought to be unreliable by some, that is for the comments section. We(community notes) should not be telling people which sources are to be trusted. That is what researching, even google is for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655741812391256065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 785DCF8BB1A252972474BCEC5C1875CEE748D1CE7CBAB0CCFE4DDF10A2E089CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1683712190066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655741812391256065785DCF8BB1A252972474BCEC5C1875CEE748D1CE7CBAB0CCFE4DDF10A2E089CC