Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 09:49:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30329FB5072DCFFE018B4E45C645FCE6D97EAE5F5C8B6A72C898660005A4A3ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet shares it's source. If the source is thought to be unreliable by some, that is for the comments section. We(community notes) should not be telling people which sources are to be trusted. That is what researching, even google is for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655741812391256065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30329FB5072DCFFE018B4E45C645FCE6D97EAE5F5C8B6A72C898660005A4A3ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1683712190066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165574181239125606530329FB5072DCFFE018B4E45C645FCE6D97EAE5F5C8B6A72C898660005A4A3ED