Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 06:01:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9A0D16730CF7DCE2872F7AA0E5C2D9876A8660B3B2150BE2CAD86F95D46093E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There’s no evidence that Tweet is genuine or the shooter’s, if genuine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655740735302279175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9A0D16730CF7DCE2872F7AA0E5C2D9876A8660B3B2150BE2CAD86F95D46093E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683612119494
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655740735302279175C9A0D16730CF7DCE2872F7AA0E5C2D9876A8660B3B2150BE2CAD86F95D46093E