Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 12:08:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C66592E0460F5C74C303B84728114DC1891757400AC5F3B085F0FA34727842E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

There’s no evidence that Tweet is genuine or the shooter’s, if genuine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655740735302279175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C66592E0460F5C74C303B84728114DC1891757400AC5F3B085F0FA34727842E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1683634120339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1655740735302279175C66592E0460F5C74C303B84728114DC1891757400AC5F3B085F0FA34727842E5