Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 18:39:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48AF0833F015D58345270CAE0146FD969133EAA4BF3E76AE9670BA9163DF111C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: suggested; the Hoover Institute is a notably conservative think tank* and the bias surrounding this question/their assertions should make any CN contributor reluctant to use them (and them alone) as a source to declare a tweet "misleading". Debate in the replies instead. *https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2015/4/21/how-the-hoover-institution-vacuums-up-big-conservative-bucks.html https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hoover-Institution-on-War-Revolution-and-Peace

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655608631797137410
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48AF0833F015D58345270CAE0146FD969133EAA4BF3E76AE9670BA9163DF111C
  • createdAtMillis - 1683571148038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165560863179713741048AF0833F015D58345270CAE0146FD969133EAA4BF3E76AE9670BA9163DF111C