Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 20:30:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0646CB4BCEACD8E96BECE97CB38507E7A56B12C626C8A69A91852A93DFDA7A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of the study received criticism from peers, and was unable to provide any evidence to back up their claims other than admitting there was no "unified approach to the 10–24-year-old life phase". This study has not received acceptance within the science community. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(18)30075-0/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655605537235664896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0646CB4BCEACD8E96BECE97CB38507E7A56B12C626C8A69A91852A93DFDA7A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1683577841752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655605537235664896A0646CB4BCEACD8E96BECE97CB38507E7A56B12C626C8A69A91852A93DFDA7A4