Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 19:35:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5FA8E36DDDA135AD2FA0916A00F671AA97235EADE0B4201283898EE1C345FD60
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of the study received criticism from peers, and was unable to provide any evidence to back up their claims other than admitting there was no "unified approach to the 10–24-year-old life phase". This study has not received acceptance within the science community. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(18)30075-0/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655605537235664896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5FA8E36DDDA135AD2FA0916A00F671AA97235EADE0B4201283898EE1C345FD60
  • createdAtMillis - 1683660935241
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16556055372356648965FA8E36DDDA135AD2FA0916A00F671AA97235EADE0B4201283898EE1C345FD60