Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 05:18:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1013AC0B538CDAE403A1250C5037418F055CD96F8FD3D266E81074FEAA60B135
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of the study received criticism from peers, and was unable to provide any evidence to back up their claims other than admitting there was no "unified approach to the 10–24-year-old life phase". This study has not received acceptance within the science community. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(18)30075-0/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655605537235664896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1013AC0B538CDAE403A1250C5037418F055CD96F8FD3D266E81074FEAA60B135
  • createdAtMillis - 1683695893796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16556055372356648961013AC0B538CDAE403A1250C5037418F055CD96F8FD3D266E81074FEAA60B135