Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 13:59:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF07E2088E2670A8FE279E912256198538267B6D50F6CD6ABFB7C3C5D9087DFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Voter fraud claims are not even remotely convincing. There's no evidence of fraud and there were not voter anomalies. There is nothing in these statistical tests that supports Trump’s claim of a stolen election. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655559135901958145
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF07E2088E2670A8FE279E912256198538267B6D50F6CD6ABFB7C3C5D9087DFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1683554394697
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655559135901958145CF07E2088E2670A8FE279E912256198538267B6D50F6CD6ABFB7C3C5D9087DFC