Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 14:33:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB1AF12893EAD9BB55D5F92AC1FB84D7F531844EC01B1F065691FE24BFC3283F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Voter fraud claims are not even remotely convincing. There's no evidence of fraud and there were not voter anomalies. There is nothing in these statistical tests that supports Trump’s claim of a stolen election. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655559135901958145
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB1AF12893EAD9BB55D5F92AC1FB84D7F531844EC01B1F065691FE24BFC3283F
  • createdAtMillis - 1683556401836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1655559135901958145CB1AF12893EAD9BB55D5F92AC1FB84D7F531844EC01B1F065691FE24BFC3283F