Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 14:33:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71231A97BB1EB386A3B0CDB5A95301D3616AE1777716B7B63FDE1F09C8ECB312
Participant Details

Original Note:

Voter fraud claims are not even remotely convincing. There's no evidence of fraud and there were not voter anomalies. There is nothing in these statistical tests that supports Trump’s claim of a stolen election. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655559135901958145
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71231A97BB1EB386A3B0CDB5A95301D3616AE1777716B7B63FDE1F09C8ECB312
  • createdAtMillis - 1683556401836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 165555913590195814571231A97BB1EB386A3B0CDB5A95301D3616AE1777716B7B63FDE1F09C8ECB312