Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-13 13:22:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B4F111CEF18169D3432D8F0AA92C1E5202284DFD7C7DFDF9510D4D8BA5276F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Voter fraud claims are not even remotely convincing. There's no evidence of fraud and there were not voter anomalies. There is nothing in these statistical tests that supports Trump’s claim of a stolen election. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655559135901958145
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B4F111CEF18169D3432D8F0AA92C1E5202284DFD7C7DFDF9510D4D8BA5276F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1683984137310
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16555591359019581452B4F111CEF18169D3432D8F0AA92C1E5202284DFD7C7DFDF9510D4D8BA5276F6