Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 14:54:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 070E96396E47D0A26009C7E93DC551BAC7F50DD635CA0A2F06B405894CE007CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Voter fraud claims are not even remotely convincing. There's no evidence of fraud and there were not voter anomalies. There is nothing in these statistical tests that supports Trump’s claim of a stolen election. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655559135901958145
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 070E96396E47D0A26009C7E93DC551BAC7F50DD635CA0A2F06B405894CE007CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1683557681972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655559135901958145070E96396E47D0A26009C7E93DC551BAC7F50DD635CA0A2F06B405894CE007CD