Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 04:14:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECBC81A03D8676B9529CCD996255DBDAB34F0F5CDBFF907E70A49F8D9D18FC21
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article posted with the above note is a fascinating read, but doesn't really support the contents of the note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655393742273015810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECBC81A03D8676B9529CCD996255DBDAB34F0F5CDBFF907E70A49F8D9D18FC21
  • createdAtMillis - 1683519291523
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1655393742273015810ECBC81A03D8676B9529CCD996255DBDAB34F0F5CDBFF907E70A49F8D9D18FC21