Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 11:49:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A8563C1843990DD011693F0D5167C70DFA077DD62DEBD5FD9F03861D1166C9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article posted with the above note is a fascinating read, but doesn't really support the contents of the note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655393742273015810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A8563C1843990DD011693F0D5167C70DFA077DD62DEBD5FD9F03861D1166C9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1683546542262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16553937422730158105A8563C1843990DD011693F0D5167C70DFA077DD62DEBD5FD9F03861D1166C9F