Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-07 18:25:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83ABF31ED6F75E992F5328D9484424DBA92EA062D8FC36FF586D6A1205646CEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is correct in its claim. Other suggestions (comparisons as to other tech firms, discussion of margin) belong in comments. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655274811751317504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83ABF31ED6F75E992F5328D9484424DBA92EA062D8FC36FF586D6A1205646CEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1683483955090
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165527481175131750483ABF31ED6F75E992F5328D9484424DBA92EA062D8FC36FF586D6A1205646CEC