Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 11:01:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72780E4B8C900E25CBF12650F723295F4BF1854F320D22DCBAE07B33937B301B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is correct in its claim. Other suggestions (comparisons as to other tech firms, discussion of margin) belong in comments. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655274811751317504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 72780E4B8C900E25CBF12650F723295F4BF1854F320D22DCBAE07B33937B301B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683543704809
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165527481175131750472780E4B8C900E25CBF12650F723295F4BF1854F320D22DCBAE07B33937B301B