Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 06:13:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E8D8B2D8BFC9F8B611E04AB9069EF494980FFC7111F559B2382BEF252FA4CFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note is correct in its claim. Other suggestions (comparisons as to other tech firms, discussion of margin) belong in comments. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655274811751317504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E8D8B2D8BFC9F8B611E04AB9069EF494980FFC7111F559B2382BEF252FA4CFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1683526380422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16552748117513175046E8D8B2D8BFC9F8B611E04AB9069EF494980FFC7111F559B2382BEF252FA4CFA