Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-07 15:27:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10942A5AE4F416F1F0A305B4B3D6C9D8DB7D00946DE79DD291F8F912E2E974DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Political opinion, tweet doesn’t imply the second amendment approves of this, tweet implies that the refusal to acknowledge the consequences of the second amendment being used as originally written in a modern age is ridiculous. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655108387791863810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10942A5AE4F416F1F0A305B4B3D6C9D8DB7D00946DE79DD291F8F912E2E974DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1683473254502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165510838779186381010942A5AE4F416F1F0A305B4B3D6C9D8DB7D00946DE79DD291F8F912E2E974DD