Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-07 15:57:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05629F80821A6026B8C8FD9CA5444AB7C030E155C4AE92351023871012E12271
Participant Details

Original Note:

El informe NO FUE APROBADO, solo 4 votos de 9 votaron a favor. Luego levantaron la sesiĆ³n. Ahora va el tema al pleno, para saber si hay o no, destituciĆ³n. https://twitter.com/fabriciovelav/status/1654965193149956098?t=7UVRht0dbk3asH329j2UVw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655013963023757313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05629F80821A6026B8C8FD9CA5444AB7C030E155C4AE92351023871012E12271
  • createdAtMillis - 1683475051573
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165501396302375731305629F80821A6026B8C8FD9CA5444AB7C030E155C4AE92351023871012E12271