Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-07 01:49:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CAC4F0E509BFA2AC389A16675624816F83E8FA930A8EE68BCA52972B3F41FE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author of tweet is expressing a subjective personal account, the evidence of an “emerald mine” requires more than a hearsay verbal rebuttal from opposite party. Misuse and demagoguery of CN due to author’s notoriety. NNN. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654995182578962432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CAC4F0E509BFA2AC389A16675624816F83E8FA930A8EE68BCA52972B3F41FE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1683424147725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16549951825789624328CAC4F0E509BFA2AC389A16675624816F83E8FA930A8EE68BCA52972B3F41FE9