Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-06 23:55:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 652FD61C7E0C9BC06C5A1171BC89330D6B81DEE0090C87CB7F5DB5043D4B1EB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author of tweet is expressing a subjective personal account, the evidence of an “emerald mine” requires more than a hearsay verbal rebuttal from opposite party. Misuse and demagoguery of CN due to author’s notoriety. NNN. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654995182578962432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 652FD61C7E0C9BC06C5A1171BC89330D6B81DEE0090C87CB7F5DB5043D4B1EB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1683417311079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654995182578962432652FD61C7E0C9BC06C5A1171BC89330D6B81DEE0090C87CB7F5DB5043D4B1EB2