Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-07 11:48:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52EAEE322F95805BBD10DCEAF871E5824574E0A0DA62A11ED499AFC7D4FA66D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author of tweet is expressing a subjective personal account, the evidence of an “emerald mine” requires more than a hearsay verbal rebuttal from opposite party. Misuse and demagoguery of CN due to author’s notoriety. NNN. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654995182578962432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52EAEE322F95805BBD10DCEAF871E5824574E0A0DA62A11ED499AFC7D4FA66D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683460080280
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165499518257896243252EAEE322F95805BBD10DCEAF871E5824574E0A0DA62A11ED499AFC7D4FA66D0