Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-07 01:54:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EDB9C5D20372653D75A2FA12CA26E6C91B3E32109A5002A2B241E251D0A699B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author of tweet is expressing a subjective personal account, the evidence of an “emerald mine” requires more than a hearsay verbal rebuttal from opposite party. Misuse and demagoguery of CN due to author’s notoriety. NNN. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654995182578962432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EDB9C5D20372653D75A2FA12CA26E6C91B3E32109A5002A2B241E251D0A699B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683424471316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16549951825789624321EDB9C5D20372653D75A2FA12CA26E6C91B3E32109A5002A2B241E251D0A699B