Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-06 12:27:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82DD4D29D25A8AAB8E5C56421943A27D666C5D27B43A54F95A1CD67D741952C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet misrepresents the court's order by referring to the fine as a "court fee," or a routine payment unrelated to misconduct. But in fact, the court order explicitly calls this "a sanction" for making multiple misrepresentations to the court. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/DecisionOrder-4768116-0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654336475801047040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82DD4D29D25A8AAB8E5C56421943A27D666C5D27B43A54F95A1CD67D741952C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1683376050284
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165433647580104704082DD4D29D25A8AAB8E5C56421943A27D666C5D27B43A54F95A1CD67D741952C3