Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 04:07:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1974C7032A5BB2A45DF0B1BD3958FD55801B2DC393B817BC2C6AE3B555E3965A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet misrepresents the court's order by referring to the fine as a "court fee," or a routine payment unrelated to misconduct. But in fact, the court order explicitly calls this "a sanction" for making multiple misrepresentations to the court. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/DecisionOrder-4768116-0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654336475801047040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1974C7032A5BB2A45DF0B1BD3958FD55801B2DC393B817BC2C6AE3B555E3965A
  • createdAtMillis - 1683259677278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16543364758010470401974C7032A5BB2A45DF0B1BD3958FD55801B2DC393B817BC2C6AE3B555E3965A