Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 12:33:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEF4CB80123CB3287C37A17C2F6CEE26D1DF1D81B8808F8C0245221836C59FBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Medrxiv articles are not peer-reviewed. Enough said.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654279451847393280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEF4CB80123CB3287C37A17C2F6CEE26D1DF1D81B8808F8C0245221836C59FBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1683290030455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654279451847393280CEF4CB80123CB3287C37A17C2F6CEE26D1DF1D81B8808F8C0245221836C59FBE