Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 02:19:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The content of the tweet is a direct quote from a court order. It also contains a link to an article with more detailed context. No note is necessary. A local newspaper corroborates the story and has an embedded PDF of the court order. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2023/05/04/ariz-supreme-court-hits-lake-attorney-with-sanctions-on-election-suit/70177506007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654262996338896898
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683253170215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16542629963388968980CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B