Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 23:20:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDD77E95DE08AA87A0916B0A809F3E619A8490A62D7E355CB0D3B221DCF16611
Participant Details

Original Note:

It hurts me to read a P.hD. professional profess such an important and public statement, based solely on one third party produced graphic, completely disregarding the actual scientific process, including the high possibility of multiple other variables.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654248241733541888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDD77E95DE08AA87A0916B0A809F3E619A8490A62D7E355CB0D3B221DCF16611
  • createdAtMillis - 1683242459994
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654248241733541888FDD77E95DE08AA87A0916B0A809F3E619A8490A62D7E355CB0D3B221DCF16611