Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 23:50:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E04B399BEB4F1EBED3149C2D4A8748F84D2ED886001DD61469CACE33EBC1E492
Participant Details

Original Note:

It hurts me to read a P.hD. professional profess such an important and public statement, based solely on one third party produced graphic, completely disregarding the actual scientific process, including the high possibility of multiple other variables.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654248241733541888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E04B399BEB4F1EBED3149C2D4A8748F84D2ED886001DD61469CACE33EBC1E492
  • createdAtMillis - 1683244236980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1654248241733541888E04B399BEB4F1EBED3149C2D4A8748F84D2ED886001DD61469CACE33EBC1E492