Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 23:29:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE4CBF12B976D9FA6EB5B725E507BF95BC0EC332F02E14441BE2B44C7A8D4DD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

It hurts me to read a P.hD. professional profess such an important and public statement, based solely on one third party produced graphic, completely disregarding the actual scientific process, including the high possibility of multiple other variables.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654248241733541888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE4CBF12B976D9FA6EB5B725E507BF95BC0EC332F02E14441BE2B44C7A8D4DD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1683242945177
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1654248241733541888CE4CBF12B976D9FA6EB5B725E507BF95BC0EC332F02E14441BE2B44C7A8D4DD5