Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 05:46:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD893207983D822FE8D41F985AF77E16932E02BDCFD1B9E9120BCA73E548256C
Participant Details

Original Note:

It hurts me to read a P.hD. professional profess such an important and public statement, based solely on one third party produced graphic, completely disregarding the actual scientific process, including the high possibility of multiple other variables.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654248241733541888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD893207983D822FE8D41F985AF77E16932E02BDCFD1B9E9120BCA73E548256C
  • createdAtMillis - 1683265580416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654248241733541888BD893207983D822FE8D41F985AF77E16932E02BDCFD1B9E9120BCA73E548256C