Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 03:36:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 795EAFC5079A6268699A12601B4B89813446DBA1FAF6BF44020E86B251AC8C1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

It hurts me to read a P.hD. professional profess such an important and public statement, based solely on one third party produced graphic, completely disregarding the actual scientific process, including the high possibility of multiple other variables.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654248241733541888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 795EAFC5079A6268699A12601B4B89813446DBA1FAF6BF44020E86B251AC8C1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683257765342
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654248241733541888795EAFC5079A6268699A12601B4B89813446DBA1FAF6BF44020E86B251AC8C1D