Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 12:41:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is false in a variety of ways and notes are not here to carry water for a political party. Original post is restating things from an article, most of which aren’t even denied and there is definitely an accusation of quid pro quo. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654208667216932866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683290482996
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16542086672169328669EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0