Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 01:02:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 952E3F0D9C417253043C059646C7C21F267CCA1C62B267777947B8F5E117EEF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is false in a variety of ways and notes are not here to carry water for a political party. Original post is restating things from an article, most of which aren’t even denied and there is definitely an accusation of quid pro quo. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654208667216932866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 952E3F0D9C417253043C059646C7C21F267CCA1C62B267777947B8F5E117EEF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1683248540529
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654208667216932866952E3F0D9C417253043C059646C7C21F267CCA1C62B267777947B8F5E117EEF6