Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 17:52:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59C22FF91EE75974AB197596A80EB6E237576A0BE98CED76486E542BEB75C311
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is false in a variety of ways and notes are not here to carry water for a political party. Original post is restating things from an article, most of which aren’t even denied and there is definitely an accusation of quid pro quo. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654208667216932866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59C22FF91EE75974AB197596A80EB6E237576A0BE98CED76486E542BEB75C311
  • createdAtMillis - 1683309148014
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165420866721693286659C22FF91EE75974AB197596A80EB6E237576A0BE98CED76486E542BEB75C311