Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 03:48:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 591BD82F4D59FC81B8C2A64482751C98A6F221D751609D7C775DA6AE904A2DD3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is false in a variety of ways and notes are not here to carry water for a political party. Original post is restating things from an article, most of which aren’t even denied and there is definitely an accusation of quid pro quo. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654208667216932866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 591BD82F4D59FC81B8C2A64482751C98A6F221D751609D7C775DA6AE904A2DD3
  • createdAtMillis - 1683258506051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1654208667216932866591BD82F4D59FC81B8C2A64482751C98A6F221D751609D7C775DA6AE904A2DD3