Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 20:53:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B6CF10C1D963C264DF0FCF02873400090DCBBC003DB9BB89609EF41F124E5EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is false in a variety of ways and notes are not here to carry water for a political party. Original post is restating things from an article, most of which aren’t even denied and there is definitely an accusation of quid pro quo. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654208667216932866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B6CF10C1D963C264DF0FCF02873400090DCBBC003DB9BB89609EF41F124E5EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1683233635326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16542086672169328660B6CF10C1D963C264DF0FCF02873400090DCBBC003DB9BB89609EF41F124E5EF