Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 15:14:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24B48D1DC2BCE0F4895613445D2C4E59497B1320FF12E8DF0191C857EC9F1BCC
Participant Details

Original Note:

A publicação não apresenta nenhuma comprovação das alegações que faz a favor da sua própria ética e dos seus companheiros de profissão, nem das imputações negativas que lança contra o Twitter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654137192422297604
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24B48D1DC2BCE0F4895613445D2C4E59497B1320FF12E8DF0191C857EC9F1BCC
  • createdAtMillis - 1683213270239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165413719242229760424B48D1DC2BCE0F4895613445D2C4E59497B1320FF12E8DF0191C857EC9F1BCC