Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 02:11:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61E9B53C3A002DBA1731B50309E108551B9671F6C892EB2A555815A242850F4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an excerpt from a thread that delves deeper into the study. Rating a small portion of a much longer thread with important context comes across as argumentative. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.22.23288965v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654072681568907265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61E9B53C3A002DBA1731B50309E108551B9671F6C892EB2A555815A242850F4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683252696344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165407268156890726561E9B53C3A002DBA1731B50309E108551B9671F6C892EB2A555815A242850F4B