Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-05 00:42:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DB4094D3184461E816AFF91661349D056C9BB8FE1B87A7E5362F554E2C7A584
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an excerpt from a thread that delves deeper into the study. Rating a small portion of a much longer thread with important context comes across as argumentative. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.22.23288965v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654072681568907265
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DB4094D3184461E816AFF91661349D056C9BB8FE1B87A7E5362F554E2C7A584
  • createdAtMillis - 1683247351724
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16540726815689072652DB4094D3184461E816AFF91661349D056C9BB8FE1B87A7E5362F554E2C7A584